Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Scholars say correction of Francis for 'heresy' marked by hypocrisy, lack of signatories

https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/scholars-say-correction-francis-heresy-marked-hypocrisy-lack-signatories#c-2988932
MGB:_This challenge looks less authoritative than the one posed by the surviving Dubia Cardinal has-beens. They don't deserve a papal response either and they would likely not understand my response, which tears their position to shreds. http://xianleft.blogspot.com/2017/06/answering-five-dubia.html

Disagreeing with bad Church proof texting on Mark or St. Paul or the rambligs of whomever was writing for St. John Paul is not heretical. Heresy is about credal issues, not natural law arguments and certainly not about the discipline of the Church.

Misquoting Christ on divorce and Paul on Communion has become Catholic branding. It is a question of discipline, not dogma and the pope has wide latitude. I wonder if this crowd realizes that they are dancing on the line of sedevacantism, especially given their association with a Pius X bishop. They are the ones commiting heresy.

No comments:

Post a Comment