"Unstable, inconsistent, and incoherent" | National Catholic Reporter

"Unstable, inconsistent, and incoherent" | National Catholic Reporter by MSW.  MGB: Yes AND because employers are using tax subsidies to provide insurance their refusal to do so is a defacto reversal of Griswold v. Connecticut.  The state cannot do that or any of its agents.  Period.  Also, the ACA only designated that the Institute of Medicine say WHAT comrehensive preventative items are to be free of co-payments.  THAT they be provided was decided by the EEOC in December 2000 for ALL policies that cover preventative services - including those contracted by the Church.